One session a month from January 2027. Enough to use the same afternoon, from someone who has published the underlying work.
One problem, worked through until you can run it yourself
A single, specific problem, not a survey of a field. We work through what it is, why it behaves the way it does, and when it applies to you. You leave able to run the check yourself on something you are actually deciding.
One a month, on a fixed slot. That is deliberate: a month is long enough to prepare something worth an hour of your time, and it means each session covers a problem I have actually worked on rather than whatever fits the calendar.
What the hour does not cover is the full implementation: calibrating a framework to your portfolio, or designing the governance that would carry it. That is the work itself, and an hour cannot honestly deliver it. I would rather say so than pretend.
The self-set benchmarkThree questions that establish whether a sustainability target your organisation has already published is capable of requiring you to improve. Run it live on your own target.
The Three GatesWhere a criterion actually enters a funding decision — scoring, weighting or eligibility — and why arguing about weights so often changes nothing.
Choosing an estimandWhat your trial is really estimating, and how to align the estimator with it. Worked from real examples under ICH E9(R1).
Probability of success as a governance toolWhy decision frameworks get presented and then ignored under time pressure, and what makes one actually get used.
Three sessions, January to March 2027
The first run is monthly, on the second Wednesday, 16:00 to 17:00 Central European Time. Each one takes a single problem from my own work. Places are limited so the hour stays a working session rather than a broadcast.